The award is given by Mashable, and Diigo was not the only winner.  There are 2 different awards for each of 26 distinct categories.  The two awards are “People’s Choice” and “Blogger’s Choice”.  In fact, the award that Diigo won was the “People’s Choice” in the “Social Bookmarking” category.

What is most interesting (and suspicious) to me is that neither of the two “most popular” (read: largest user base) social bookmarking sites — Delicious and StumbleUpon, even made runner-up, when in fact they were ranked #1 and #2 respectively in the “Blogger’s Choice” award.

So what does this award actually mean?

There was no critical analysis or comparison done for the “People’s Choice” award, it was simply a popularity contest.  Each user was allowed to vote once per day over the course of two weeks.  So basically, it means that Diigo’s user base is more dedicated and motivated than are either Delicious’ or StumbleUpon’s.  It could also mean that Diigo did a better job of getting the award [word] out to it’s users than did the other two.

That’s it.

I would really like to know what the estimated user base for both Diigo and Delicious is.  It still amazes me that neither StumbleUpon nor Delicious was able to crack the top two in the popularity contest.  #2 was ShareThis.  Never heard of it.

Along those same lines, I just recently discovered a Firefox Add-on called Read It Later.  You can add links to this specialized bookmark tool, sort of a holding place for links you want to visit later.  It has some interesting features like being able to click multiple links on a page to add to your “read it later” list, without having to following those links.  You can then “check off” the links as you read them.

There’s a danger in storing your bookmarks in too many locations.  Diigo also allows you to mark bookmarks as “unread”.  But I could see this tool being useful for articles that I want to read sometime, but don’t necessarily ever want to come back to.  Who knows?

For awhile I kept a personal link list on my website, but it was not stupidly simple to maintain and update and eventually the links fell out of date. I had thought of trying one of those online bookmarking services, but my system of keyword memorization worked so well I didn’t think I needed it.

The Problem Memorization works fine as long as you remember that you want to remember something. If you forget about something that you wanted to remember, then it doesn’t matter if you remember keywords or not – it’s already forgotten.

I suppose an example is in order. One day at work I’m googling for “Advanced CSS techniques” and find a great article that I just don’t have time to read right now. So I file it away in memory. The problem is, I later forget that there was something that I had wanted to read. If I could remember that, then I could easily find the article again. Got it?

The Solution Recently I came across this online bookmarking service called Diigo, which stands for “Digest of Internet Information, Groups and Other stuff”. It actually let’s you highlight pages with your own comments, and even mark links as “Read” or “Unread” so you can quickly mark something of interest and go back and read it later.

So I’m no longer a memory guy, I’m a Diigo guy. And I feel so much more organized!

Do you use an online bookmarking service? If so, which one, and what do you like/dislike about it?

Wow, two days, two posts. What’s wrong with me!!?